42 Comments

I’ll admit Lisa, I was pretty irked that this will be seen as some new revelation by the NYT and the article’s author/s. I so wish you were getting the recognition you deserve, publicly and monetarily.

Expand full comment

I feel the same. It's as if the NYT writers "discovered" that PB's could be harming kids. Who knew?? Uhhhh.....so many people who have been saying this for years and trying to get them to publish it. I am really glad that NYT put that piece out - grateful even. But my undying gratitude and appreciation goes to Lisa and the many that I do count as heroes who have been voicing their concerns, and incurring harm for it, for years.

Expand full comment

I too am heartened by the fact that the NYT published this article. And while the lack of acknowledgment of previous mis-reporting (or non-reporting) is frustrating, it’s hardly surprising.

My bigger concern, though, is that many readers may come away with the idea that the biggest issue with puberty blockers is physiological side effects (e.g., on bone density) and so it’s just a question of trade-offs and/or mitigation (calcium supplements!). There’s only passing mention of the idea that puberty blockers end up being a “gateway drug” to cross-sex hormones, and that being allowed to go through natural puberty would likely cause the resolution of gender dysphoria in the vast majority of these kids. But I guess that’s still a bridge too far for the NYT. Baby steps...

Expand full comment

Thank you for this, Lisa, and especially for the very important point regarding the use of "transgender kids". I agree with you 100 percent and I've said it to anyone who would listen: trans is what you do, not who you are. There are many ways to deal with gender dysphoria and medical transition is one of them, perhaps the most radical and one that should arguably be the last resort. I do hope that Corinna is right about medicalization being only for adults in the future, I really do think that's the only right way.

In my parental forum for parents of trans-identifying kids someone asked how we think this craze is going to end. I think we can see the end now, and it'll be not with a bang but with a whimper.

Expand full comment

I think this is an extremely important point that doesn’t get enough coverage. Generally speaking, it seems to have escaped the average person that what we mean when we say “trans” is not a stable or well defined thing anymore.

Expand full comment

I wholeheartedly agree with Corinna's assertion that "there will be no heroes in this movement." As an outspoken trans man, on this very topic, I have faced the backlash. I will not be silenced.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 18, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

"The most vocal 'trans activists' grossly misrepresent the majority of the trans community"

I would like to discover that your claim is true:

that the greater trans demographics holds views - about the 'gender affirmation' model, about the massive spike in teenage girls presenting as trans, and about the risks and unknowns of medicalization - that are at odds with "'trans activists.'"

Can you support your claim? Are there polls, or evaluations of attitudes, perhaps based on medical/psychological services self-reported information, or discussions of attitudes discoverable on trans internet sites?

Please note that this is a good faith question.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 18, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

laugh - ayup - it's just that kinda anecdotalism writ large i'm hoping to get beyond - on the second of the two Hill Rising pieces I cited earlier, the trans advocate was at pains to point out her positions were based mainly on her own experience - prob' is that, at the same time it limits her authority, the 'authority of experience' is its own kind of claim to authority - 'every person i've ever talked to, and i've talked to a lot' kind of thing.

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

I think we are going to have to be prepared for the possibility that even though there may be a sizable shift in how gender dysphoria is treated in children, the idea of gender dysphoria and transitioning as a go-to explanation and treatment for people with a wide variety of vague or ambiguous mental health issues is here to stay and we will still be dealing with numbers of people transitioning and regretting that will be fewer than now but still greater than before the 2010s explosion of these numbers. Precedent can be seen in the often cited satanic panic daycare scandal and the coinciding repressed memory scandals. Despite the fact that these scandals are long past the time when they captured their peak number of people, research shows that 60-89% of mental health therapists still believe in the wrong idea at the core of those scandals - that traumatic memories can be “repressed” completely and suddenly “recovered” under the right conditions. People everywhere are still hearing this idea from their therapists and reading about it in the wildly popular (and therapist recommended) book The Body Keeps the Score and using third incorrect concept as a way to understand their distress. I think we need to be prepared for “gender dysphoria” and “born in the wrong body” to stay in the public mind and the words of therapists in the same way. We  are going to have to hope that doctors and institutions will at least become more conservative and cautious in allowing people to medicalize based on these beliefs in the future, and any chances of that happening will be the result of lawsuits causing doctors and insurance companies to be less likely to provide or pay for medicalization. 

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

"WaPo banned commenting bitch" - a badge of distinction, a "posthumous" medal for having made the ultimate sacrifice in the transgender wars ... 👏👍 😉

Reminds me of a quip by Churchill: "You have enemies? Good. It means you've stood up for some principles."

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 18, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thanks for the link; a rather credible, thorough and surprising but quite welcome essay from Reuters; further evidence that the tide is thankfully turning. It is profoundly encouraging to see that some journalists, “mainstream media” outlets, and medical professionals are finally able to show some spine, some commitment to some important principles. No doubt it takes some guts to stand up and be counted, to say – in effect – “no, I’m Spartacus”, particularly when it is entirely possible that one will be “crucified”, one way or the other, for one’s efforts.

But I was somewhat disappointed if not profoundly saddened to read about transman Kulovitz “coming out” as someone who was “gay” as one might reasonably wonder whether that describes “his” attraction to other females or to males. Seems like “he” would have benefitted greatly from reading a guest post here on “An Ode to the Tomboys and Butch Lesbians”:

https://lisaselindavis.substack.com/p/guest-essay-an-ode-to-the-tomboys

I can well appreciate that women, in general, have a significantly heavier burden in the reproductive department than do men, and I can sympathize with Kulovitz and other transmen being “thrilled” when “his menstrual periods stopped”. However, I rather doubt that we’re doing the transgendered any favours at all in what is little short of pandering to their delusions that they can actually change sex. In a Slate article by Michelle Goldberg, “Helen Highwater” -- one of the more sensible transwomen on the scene -- in a rather remarkable but commendable case of brutal self-honesty, kind of nailed that perspective to the mast:

“Yet [Highwater] has come to reject the idea that she is truly female or that she ever will be. Though ‘trans women are women’ has become a trans rights rallying cry, Highwater writes, it primes trans women for failure, disappointment, and cognitive dissonance. She calls it a ‘vicious lie.’ ....”

https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/12/gender-critical-trans-women-the-apostates-of-the-trans-rights-movement.html

http://genderapostates.com/trans-women-are-women-is-a-lie/

“vicious lie”, indeed. Transgender ideology is making pretty much all of us – society in general, at least – culpable in the biggest “Big Lie”, and the most odious medical scandal to come down the pike in a very long time indeed.

Which brings me to the more odious aspects of that Reuters article, the worst of which are their blithe, if not criminally negligent use of the phrases “assigned female at birth”, and “transition from female to male”. While there is some merit in being critical of the former – at least from view afforded by the biological definitions for the sexes by which the prepubescent don’t actually acquire a sex until they hit puberty – the phrase is, more odiously, simply a transgender dog whistle, part and parcel of their dogma by which sex is merely “socially constructed” and is totally disconnected from any reliance on actual reproductive abilities as necessary and sufficient conditions for membership in the “female” and "male" sex categories.

Substacker Eliza Mondegreen had recent essay critical of transwoman – and “biologist” -- Julia Serano who is supposedly “a touchstone in progressive circles” on transgender issues, and whose book, “Whipping Girl”, is seen as a “foundational text” in the “discussion of gender, transsexuality and femininity”:

https://elizamondegreen.substack.com/p/just-whip-it-out-already

However, a reading of Serano’s 2017 Medium post gives the solid impression that “she” is rather desperate to deny that there is anything that uniquely differentiates males from females – something of a “career-limiting” stance for a biologist -- probably because any acknowledgment, much less an endorsement of the biological definitions would show “her” to be spouting arrant nonsense. Archive of “her” article, “Transgender People and ‘Biological Sex’ Myths”:

https://archive.ph/yazMV

But I think the biggest problem in the Reuters article is that second phrase of theirs, “transition from female to male”. While many people don’t realize that there is NO intrinsic meaning at all to the terms “male” and “female”, the fact of the matter is that the standard biological definitions for the sexes stipulate that to have a sex is to have functional gonads of either of two types; those with neither being, ipso facto, sexless:

https://academic.oup.com/molehr/article/20/12/1161/1062990

https://web.archive.org/web/20181020204521/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/female

https://web.archive.org/web/20190608135422/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/male

By which token, there is no way on gawd’s green earth that any human is going to change sex. We should recognize that for any transperson to actually do so would require them to replace one set of gonads with an entirely functional set of the other type – and all of the supporting “equipment” – genitalia, hormones, & developmental systems -- that go along with them. Transpeople who have their gonads removed don’t change their sex from male to female or vice versa; they simply turn themselves into sexless eunuchs.

Reuters’ use of those phrases is simply and quite odiously part and parcel of that same “Big Lie” which should be deprecated if not anathematized in no uncertain terms. It’s great that they have (finally) acknowledged the rather large and quite poisonous “flies” in the transgender “ointment”, but using those phrases betrays an inadvertent if not egregiously dishonest endorsement of transgender ideology.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 19, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I appreciated it too -- something of a major sea change by mainstream media. Just think there are a few flies in the ointment; "accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative" 🙂

But quite agree with you on the "creepy TikTok doc". There should be a whole bunch of so-called "doctors" who lose their licenses -- if not be strung up by their nuts and left to twist in the wind -- once the dust settles on this medical scandal.

However, while I also quite agree about the "public learning what's happening to kids", the bastardization of language is the thin edge of the wedge. First, transgender ideologues use "male" and "female" as genders, and then next thing one knows is that that is being used to justify putting "adult human males (penis-havers)" into women's sports, prisons, toilets, and change rooms.

See this oldish essay (archived) of a Quillette post on "Words Lose Their Meaning at Wilfrid Laurier University", and a salient quote therefrom:

"Though different literary forms, the key message of both works [by Orwell: 1984, & Politics and the English Language] was the same: beware any person or group that redefines words so that they no longer align with facts, common sense, and common usage."

https://archive.ph/rKKcl

The proximate cause of my "defenestration" 😉 by Wikipedia was because I had objected to their article on transwoman and Olympian Laurel Hubbard which claimed that "she" had "transitioned to female":

https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/wikipedias-lysenkoism

Coastal: "... casually in a sentence like you ... plan on using defenestration in a sentence at 3 times today ..."

🙂 Use a word three times and it's yours forever. Though I note that Lisa used the word herself in her post. But it kind of "helps" to have actually been thrown out of a "window" or two -- multiple times -- to put a bit of "bite" into the use of the word ... 😉

Though many people, yourself included, are clearly in the same boat. Nice to see increasing levels of push-back on that score:

https://lawrencekrauss.substack.com/p/frances-widdowson-fired-for-asking

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

🙂 But the ACLU is just another sad case of the rot that transgenderism has wrought -- so to speak. You might have some interest in my further elaborations on the theme in the context of what it has done to various governmental statistics departments:

https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/statistics-departments-corrupted

Of particular note there is a link to longer paper by Joanna Williams on other cases of "ideological capture".

But I've been similarly "defenestrated" by various papers, and blogs, including by Wikipedia and by Twitter for "offending" the Tranish Inquisition. Recently tried getting reinstated at Twitter because of the new broom there but not holding my breath ... 🙂

Expand full comment

I agree with most of what you wrote but I 1000% support all laws which protect women and girls sports. As a former female athlete and a second wave feminist these were hard fought rights that we should not deny to our daughters and granddaughters. Every two or three days I hear the latest story of a boy knocking a girl off the podium or the team and taking their awards, recognition and scholarships. That's a hard no for me.

Expand full comment

One of the first things I thought about the NYT article (I’m too jaded and angry for any sense of relief from an article that posed a little to much of the “both sides” softening and was years overdue) was how infuriating it must feel to have worked so hard to get this message out only to get rejected. You say it’s not important but it absolutely is.

I want to add to what Corinna said: we can’t underestimate the importance of the courageous detransitioners who are telling their stories. I believe they are largely responsible for whatever shifts we are seeing. I hate that we need them to bare their souls when they’re dealing with such trauma, but we do for the harm to end.

Expand full comment

Lisa, thank you. You have put the current situation in a perfect little nutshell. On a personal level, things like the NYT article give me hope for my kid, but also exhaust me. I've gotten my hopes up so many times, only for our situation to backslide. And I live in a very liberal city that will probably fight this tooth and nail. Our new mayor issued a declaration against "conversion therapy," that I doubt very much is even happening in our community, and I have no doubt talk therapy/exploration for gender dysphoric kids will be called conversion therapy by many of my fellow parents. I truly hope the tide is turning. My kid turns 18 in a little over a year.

Expand full comment

It's hard because if you have a teen who is struggling with ADHD, anxiety, depression and gender dysphoria you really can't trust a therapist not to affirm the dysphoria. With that you are left concluding that the mental healthcare industry is stacked against helping your teen since they won't question whether the co-morbid conditions might have caused the teen to conclude they are the opposite sex. My family has decided that no therapy is the answer for us.

Expand full comment

Yes, yes, we feel trapped and have given up on therapy for now. We found a non-affirming, very kind, good therapist, but kid claimed they could tell the therapist "Knew nothing about trans people" because he was asking them questions about their identity instead of confirming they are a girl and need hormones. Our kid has Tourette's Syndrome and I suspect is on the spectrum, but no one wants to look at how those issues impact his thinking.

Expand full comment

agree. I've dispatched two already and so far can't find one I trust

Expand full comment

I whole heartedly agree 👍

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Oh my god, I have the same dreams. I had one where my son was swimming with his shirt off, like he did before all this happened. He was so energetic and comfortable in his body before all this: cartwheels on the beach, wrestling with me and his dad, jumping on the trampoline with friends, etc, etc. It all stopped. We have kept family photos up, and they have not complained, but maybe that will be the next gut-punch.

Expand full comment

I was very, very glad to see that NY Times article, but am equally as glad that you have written this and also that you have made it shareable. A lot of really good people, like you and others here whose stories I have come to know, thanks to your chat area, have suffered terribly and needlessly. Even as we can be grateful that, perhaps, the fever is beginning to break, we must never forget all the damage that has been done to so many. So, thank you, Lisa, once again.

Expand full comment

I also think we need to create a better operational definition of what it means when it is said there are at least some people who truly seem to benefit from transition that includes the realities of medical and even just social transition. These are people who are able to transition and due to psychology, personality type, and temperamental factors have a high tolerance for the side effects and required ongoing maintenance of transition-related medicine as well as the ability to own, tolerate, and accept all the psychological demands required to live in a way that will not 100% match the physical realities of their body and will require accepting they don’t have control over the perceptions or thoughts of others - and also accept that this inner acceptance and tolerance may change or fatigue over time. Corinna Cohn does such a good job talking about those inner experiences over her 30 years living as a medicalize trans woman.

Expand full comment

"I oppose bans because a) I don’t want the government making those decisions and b) I think they get in the way of desperately needed reform."

Who else but the government is going to protect the public from baseless medical charlatanism? Should we abolish drug screening by the FDA because it restricts patient choice? No, of course not.

And what reform do you envision if not the banning of pseudoscientific medical procedures that do immense harm?

Expand full comment

another excellent piece. I too share some shred of hope. Yes, the left needs to take responsibility for their extremity. The media points out when the right lurches, but never the other way and I'm a lefty! Like McMartin, no one will print "we got it wrong". Did the op eds that supported the Iraq invasion recant? No, it was Bush's fault, not them for going along with it. But, find we don't need "i told you so." Just protect kids please. Also great point about the word trans. I feel the conflation of trans right and stopping medicalization is problamatic for those of us wanting kids to be safe. All people should be treated with respect and disfiguring distressed youths must end. Both can be true.

Expand full comment

Wait a minute. The Iraq debacle *was* Bush's fault!

Are you suggesting that we hold those who accept a lie more responsible for the lie than the liar who told it?

Strange inversion of justice, that.

Expand full comment

Can it be that the social environment children live in -- their peers and parents of peers -- are driving them to experience the depression and anxiety we see? Is it possible that the sensitive boys the tomboy girls are reacting to a hostile world? These are children after all.

Expand full comment

Worth considering: Dr. Gabor Maté on “The Myth of Normal,” Healing in a Toxic Culture & How Capitalism Fuels Addiction interview on Democracy Now

Expand full comment

I am so jazzed! I think we've hit the tipping point. Check out this Reuters article which just came out today in *favor* of the social contagion theory: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-transyouth-topsurgery/

Expand full comment

It’s a start, but would be better if it didn’t constantly use the phrases “assigned (fe)male at birth” or “gender-affirming surgery.”

Similarly: “Likewise, at least 776 chest masculinization surgeries were performed on patients ages 13 to 17 with a gender dysphoria diagnosis over the past three years.” -- should really say, “Likewise, at least 776 double mastectomies were performed on 13 to 17-year-old girls who thought they were boys over the past three years.”

The euphemisms hide the horror of what is happening.

Expand full comment

Agreed! Hopefully we can get past the euphemisms soon.

Expand full comment

Very interesting and balanced article.

Expand full comment

"When the Satanic Panic turned out to be a mass hysteria, there were no media mea culpas then, either."

Yup. Many 'gender affirming' advocates have unscrupulously smeared folks worried about the dangers of medicalization as 'anti-trans' and 'transphobic' to in order to win by shutting up First Amendment public speech - discussion and argument that might challenge these views.

This is part of a longstanding pattern that includes not only the American Salem witch hysteria of the 1600s, but later, overtly political hysterias and attacks on free speech - the post-WWI Red Scare and the 1950s McCarthy Period 'witch trials' that took its name from the 1600s hysteria.

When the McCarthy Period anti-communist witch hunts were finally politically resisted - by a rising generation of anti-southern-segregation and anti-Vietnam War youth - there were few media mea culpas for the personal and political damage either - not for Americans who lost their jobs, not for weakened labor unions, not for weakened New Deal legislation, not for stifled freedom of speech.

And it continues. In the early aughts, those resisting war criminal President Bush's non-fact-based Iraq invasion were smeared as Sadaam lovers; and now calls for US negotiation efforts - versus a purely military response to Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine - are smeared as 'Putin loving' to shut up free speech about US foreign policy, even as majorities of Americans poll as favoring increased US negotiation.

Expand full comment

It's disappointing to hear you contribute to the gaslighting and maligning of those seeking to safeguard kids from a predatory medical industry. Governments regulate all sorts of things. One could just as well say that your writing on this issue helps "solidify fear and hatred of kids who identify as trans".

Expand full comment

I completely agree. Medically worthless mutilation and sterilization of children is a crime against humanity, full stop. OF COURSE the government should stop it!

Expand full comment