I would like to see reporters covering the issue of gender care for young people read Hannah Barnes’ Time to Think and the lessons learned from the rise and fall of the Tavistock gender clinic. In publications like the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, there is no acknowledgment of developments in the UK and few if any references to changing poli…
I would like to see reporters covering the issue of gender care for young people read Hannah Barnes’ Time to Think and the lessons learned from the rise and fall of the Tavistock gender clinic. In publications like the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, there is no acknowledgment of developments in the UK and few if any references to changing policies in other European countries. Inconvenient facts are ignored or explained away.
No *curiosity* about what they might be missing ... I'm willing to bet that at least half of the reporters on this beat couldn't explain what GIDS is or how a systematic evidence review differs from the approaches taken by the AAP, AMA, and WPATH regarding gender medicine for minors.
I would like to see reporters covering the issue of gender care for young people read Hannah Barnes’ Time to Think and the lessons learned from the rise and fall of the Tavistock gender clinic. In publications like the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, there is no acknowledgment of developments in the UK and few if any references to changing policies in other European countries. Inconvenient facts are ignored or explained away.
No acknowledgement of what happened at the GIDS, no acknowledgement of the systematic evidence reviews...
No *curiosity* about what they might be missing ... I'm willing to bet that at least half of the reporters on this beat couldn't explain what GIDS is or how a systematic evidence review differs from the approaches taken by the AAP, AMA, and WPATH regarding gender medicine for minors.