I think the public incorrectly thinks that most medical doctors follow clinical research. The vast majority of MDs are smart people who are good at memorization, but are just following a protocol from a higher authority (professional organization, federal institution, etc). They are much more technicians than scientists. For a long time …
I think the public incorrectly thinks that most medical doctors follow clinical research. The vast majority of MDs are smart people who are good at memorization, but are just following a protocol from a higher authority (professional organization, federal institution, etc). They are much more technicians than scientists. For a long time it has been my experience that the average doctor (including specialists) have very little sense of inquiry into the why and how of a patient's condition, but just look to fit them into a diagnostic box so they can superficially address their symptoms. Gender distress is no different.
I think the public incorrectly thinks that most medical doctors follow clinical research. The vast majority of MDs are smart people who are good at memorization, but are just following a protocol from a higher authority (professional organization, federal institution, etc). They are much more technicians than scientists. For a long time it has been my experience that the average doctor (including specialists) have very little sense of inquiry into the why and how of a patient's condition, but just look to fit them into a diagnostic box so they can superficially address their symptoms. Gender distress is no different.