Currently the AAP is asking active members (those involved in writing, sections and councils) to give their private email address and not to use their institutional academic emails in correspondence with the AAP.
Currently the AAP is asking active members (those involved in writing, sections and councils) to give their private email address and not to use their institutional academic emails in correspondence with the AAP.
IтАЩm guessing subpoena avoidance. IтАЩm one of those people. Im a pediatrician appalled by the direction the AAP has taken on gender issues. My work with them is not at all related to this. The email thing made no sense.
I'm sure they anticipate being named in future law suits particularly if the medical professional or facility relies on their best practices advice. They'll want as little written trail that could be subject to civil discovery demands. Aren't they also supposedly conducting a systematic review of the current evidence? They probably want to make sure it will be difficult to question the impartiality of that review. In any event it's probably a good idea to maintain a repository of these emails in case they'd be helpful in the future.
Currently the AAP is asking active members (those involved in writing, sections and councils) to give their private email address and not to use their institutional academic emails in correspondence with the AAP.
For FOIA evasion?
IтАЩm guessing subpoena avoidance. IтАЩm one of those people. Im a pediatrician appalled by the direction the AAP has taken on gender issues. My work with them is not at all related to this. The email thing made no sense.
Can you send me their request asking you to do that?
Let me locate it. I will send it to another email and snd to you. What email address?
My full name at gmail!
Thx!
What do you think? Very very weird and suspicious. Total bullshit in my mind.
I'm sure they anticipate being named in future law suits particularly if the medical professional or facility relies on their best practices advice. They'll want as little written trail that could be subject to civil discovery demands. Aren't they also supposedly conducting a systematic review of the current evidence? They probably want to make sure it will be difficult to question the impartiality of that review. In any event it's probably a good idea to maintain a repository of these emails in case they'd be helpful in the future.