Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Inger's avatar

I was curious to hear about WPATH commissioning a review from John Hopkins and then ignoring it? Can anyone tell me more about this?

Expand full comment
Susan Scheid's avatar

Thank you, as always, to both of you for putting these in briefs together. Chakrabarti’s interview with Cass on WBUR was an extraordinary breath of fresh air, wasn’t it? Chakrabarti, as Cass noted at one point, was extremely well prepared. She asked intelligent questions to which Cass gave thoughtful, informative answers. This is the journalism we have needed, and I hope we will see more, including LISA in the New York Times, for heaven’s sake!

I do want to caution, on the May 5 entry, “New York Public School passes an anti-transgender sports resolution,” that this headline, as well as the paragraph from the article, is extremely biased in ways we all know. This is a very important issue in NYC, where parents are simply trying to get NYC public schools to conduct a review of public school guidelines on gender as they relate to girls sports. You can read the resolution here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ygeLcQW4loVaAkXz7zKftye7HyspJzGe/view Though the resolution from CEC2 passed 8-3, those voting in favor have been harassed and worse, including by Manhatttan Borough President, Mark Levine. You can read about that here: https://www.westsidespirit.com/news-alert-section/cb5-in-revolt-against-boro-pres-mark-levine-fires-off-letter-urging-rescind-craig-slutzkin-s-ouster-ED3353699 and here: https://nypost.com/2024/04/20/us-news/parent-volunteers-face-retaliation-following-gender-policy-vote/

I know how hard it is to put these in briefs together, but to the extent possible, I do recommend having antennae up for poor and biased reporting. For example, a piece like this, which gives Chase Strangio at the ACLU such fulsome coverage needs to be a red flag.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts