Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hazel-rah's avatar

Biologist here. Yep. 100% of the data favoring transition is low-quality. Why? It's fairly easy for anyone to tell. Just check to see if the results are based on what the study/survey subjects "report", i.e. depending entirely on people's own self-assessments.

--Much of it comes from anonymous uncontrolled online surveys of self-selecting, self-defining, self-assessing people. Spoiler alert: you are the worst person to try to assess yourself objectively, especially if you suffer from a mental condition that warps your self-perception. Consider the anorexic who insists they're doing great and feeling better after losing another 5 lbs.

--Even the more controlled studies are based on self-assessments, in the form of filling out multiple-choice questionnaires. people's subjectivity in self-assessment makes the resulting data low-quality, in contrast to objective criteria like documented suicides/attempts, documented diagnoses by clinicians, documented prescriptions for psych medications and documented insurance claims. All of this objective data shows that transition either doesn't help or makes things worse for the patient.

--Self-assessment-based studies are unable to account for the fact that people want to believe they are getting better and that people lie in order to get what they want. The coaching that trans activists do to young and inexperienced dysphoric people results in them saying they've had suicidal thoughts (clinically known as "suicidality") when they haven't.

--The studies that support transition are generally short-term, while the ones that don't are mostly longer-term. This is because it's natural for dysphoric kids and adults who have been waiting sometimes for years to begin their transition to feel joy and euphoria after they finally begin. That euphoria lasts for months or longer, before reality slowly begins to set in. In the meantime their questionnaire responses will seem to show that transition is having its desired effect.

For example, these long-term followup studies from Denmark and Sweden on transgender pre-op and post-op, respectively, show that suicide rates peaked starting 5 years and 10 years after transition, respectively:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2806531?guestAccessKey=458dc50a-ea74-489c-bc68-c0128d48a4e3

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885

Expand full comment
Friki's avatar

With regards to Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, it is imprecise to say that he signed an executive order last week that bans transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports.

The actual order can be found here: https://www.nassaucountyny.gov/DocumentCenter/View/43897/EXEC-ORDER-2-24?bidId=

The word "transgender" doesn't appear in the order once.

As he explains, "if a league or team identifies themselves or advertises themselves to be a girls or women’s league or team, then biological males should not be competing in those leagues..."

It's true that the effect of this order would prohibit men who identify as transgender (i.e. "transwomen") from playing on women's teams, but that's not because they are, or identify as, transgender, it's because they're male. Women who identify as transgender will face no restriction to their participation on women's teams.

The media gets this wrong every single time. We don't have to follow their lead, and should do better.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts