Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Muffin Mama's avatar

I think it’s interesting that the judge would frame all witnesses as opposing child medicalization for religious reasons when those of us who are fighting tooth and nail to save our children can only think of the horrific side effects these treatments cause. There’s nothing religious about that. It’s pure parental instinct to protect a child from physical harm. It’s ironic that Moody uses religion to swat the state’s witnesses since it is gender ideology that is the religion(belief system). And, it’s being taught as fact to a whole generation of children in public schools-violating the establishment clause of the constitution. I hope someone brings that case soon

(John/Jane schoolchild vs. US dept of education) Those of us opposed to the ideology need to be the plaintiffs.

Expand full comment
Lisa Selin Davis's avatar

Oops, I mistakenly put myself as the author!! Don’t give me credit. This is the fine work of UB!!

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts